Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 F.3d 1286 - Billy Ray Fox v. Ron Ward -

Billy Ray Fox v. Ron Ward -’s Empirical Analysis

200 F.3d 1286 · 2000

Citation profile

113
cited by 113 later decisions
3
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Alvie James Hale v. Gary Gibson (2000), United States v. Kennedy (2000)

45 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

800200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Bruton v. United States · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On habeas review, we will not disturb the state court's evidentiary rulings unless the appellant demonstrates that the court's error was so grossly prejudicial that it fatally infected the trial and denied the fundamental fairness that is the essence of due process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “completely unreasonable, not merely wrong, so that [they] bear no relationship to a possible defense strategy,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “infected the trial to such an extent that it resulted in a fundamentally unfair trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.