Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 F.3d 30 - John Pearson v. First Nh Mortgage Corporation Wadleigh Starr Peters Dunn & Chiesa Citizens Bank of New Hampshire Victor Dahar Geraldine Karonis

John Pearson v. First Nh Mortgage Corporation Wadleigh Starr Peters Dunn & Chiesa Citizens Bank of New Hampshire Victor Dahar Geraldine Karonis’s Empirical Analysis

200 F.3d 30 · 1999

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney General (2000), Roger Edwards, LLC v. Fiddes & Son Ltd. (2005)

5 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

280199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 554

Relies on Burns v. Windsor Insurance · Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp. · United States v. Shaffer Equipment Co. · Rome v. Braunstein · John's Insulation, Inc. v. L. Addison & Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]raud on the court occurs[ ] where it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.