Parrott v. Abramsen’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2018
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Stump v. Sparkman · Mireles v. Waco · Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic · Ransom v. Marrazzo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must set forth facts from which a conspiratorial agreement between the defendants can be inferred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.