Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

200 F. App'x 185

Cheh v. Diaz

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-09-15

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2006-09-15

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Dr. Unte Cheh appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his civil action asserting employment discrimination and other claims against his former employer. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cheh v. Diaz, No. CA-03-2414-8-AW (D. Md. June 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

*

¶3 We did not consider any filings submitted after April 27, 2006, because the court made clear that it would consider only pleadings submitted on or before that date.

/200/fappx/185 · .json · Public domain