Ali v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229 (§ 239 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 263 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Soadjede v. Ashcroft · Ahmed v. Gonzales · Singh v. Gonzales · Bustamante-Barrera v. Gonzales · Ali v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“contest his removability to the immigration judge, he cannot argue now that the judge lacked jurisdiction to find him removable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.