Stevenson v. Flemming’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 414 (§ 214 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Walker v. Altmeyer · United States v. Lalone · 133 F. Supp. 205 - Thurston v. Hobby · 131 F. Supp. 851 - Irvin v. Hobby · 156 F. Supp. 631 - Crooks v. Folsom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The reviewing court is not free to substitute any inferences it may draw from the facts for those made by the administrative body entrust- . ed with the enforcement of the statute, provided that this administrative determination was based upon substantial evidence in the record.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.