Epstein v. Shindler’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1980
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78P (§ 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Huntington v. Attrill · Schreiber v. Sharpless · Smolowe v. Delendo Corp. · Barnes Coal Corp. v. Retail Coal Merchants Ass'n · Sullivan v. Associated Billposters & Distributors of United States & Canada
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is penal or remedial seems bound to result in the conclusion that . . . it is both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.