Speybroeck v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 1972
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Callender v. State · State v. Huggins · Walker v. State · Snedegar v. State · Brazeale v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The warrant here was neither read nor referred to by the officers until after the search was made. The search was therefore unlawful and under the rule of law established in this state by Callender v. State (1922), 193 Ind. 91 , 138 N. E. 817 , and the cases following it, the evidence obtained thereby was not admissible against the owner or manager of the premises.” 200 Ind. at 73 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dusch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.