Foust v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 1985 · most notably Barker v. State (1958), Madison v. State (1955)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eacock v. State · Agar v. State · Williams v. State · Brunaugh v. State · Miller v. Coulter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An indictment or information charging larceny should set forth the particular kind of property charged to have been stolen, but it is not necessary to so specify and describe it as to identify it from other property of the same class. Where, however, a more particular description is given, it must be proved substantially as laid." (Citations omitted and emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flores v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.