Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 Md. 72 - Haley v. State

Haley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably Williams v. State (1982), State v. Devers and Webster (1971)

24 state decisions

701952196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Navemar Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima Sa v. The Navemar · In re Muir · In re Baiz · The Pesaro · Madison v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Swedish Ambassador has not notified the Department of State.officially that Mr. Haley is so employed and the Secretary of State has not, therefore, transmitted his name to the Marshal of the District of Columbia in accordance with provisions of law as set forth in Sections 252-254, Title 22, United States Code.” Id. at 79 . The State Department’s letter went on:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"[W]e do not assume to sit in judgment upon the decision of the executive in reference to the public character of a person claiming to be a foreign minister, and therefore have the right to accept the certificate of the State Department that a party is or is not a privileged person, and cannot properly be asked to proceed upon argumentative or collateral proof....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.