Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 MDAPP 240 - Anderson v. Joseph

Anderson v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Crawford · 177 Md. App. 562 - Minh-Vu Hoang v. Hewitt Avenue Associates, LLC · Colburn v. Colburn · Cook v. Boehl · Arbesman v. Winer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When an action has been tried without a jury, the appellate court will review the case on both the law and evidence. It will not set aside the judgment of the trial court on the evidence unless clearly erroneous, and will give due regard to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.