Boudeman v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1956
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad · Atkinson v. Japink · Hunt v. Supreme Council · McGrath v. Detroit, Mackinac & Marquette R. R. · Peninsular Stove Co. v. Osmun
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the testimony is all one way, is uncontradicted by any testimony given in the case, either from a party’s own witnesses, or the other party’s witnesses, either on direct or drawn out on cross-examination, or by any facts or circumstances’ in the case, is not in itself in any way improbable or discredited, and but one legitimate inference may be drawn from it, and a case is thereby made for the plaintiff or a defense made for the defendant, the duty rests upon the court to direct a verdict.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jonescu v. Orlich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.