Roach v. Kelsey Wheel Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 1967
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co. · Kanscheit v. Garrett Laundry Co. · Brunette v. Quincy Mining Co. · Lobuzek v. American Car & Foundry Co. · Hamilton v. Macey Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule in question was within the power of the board to adopt. It is reasonable and valid; it not only binds the board, and litigants before it, but it binds this court. Being reasonable and within the power- of the board, this court must follow it and recognize it in cases coming here for review.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reno v. Holmes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.