Harvey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park Bank · McGovern v. . City of New York · W. H. H. Chamberlin, Inc. v. Andrews · 5 Ohio Op. 306 - W. H. H. Chamberlin, Inc. v. Andrews · Schuttinger v. Woodruff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If utilized by the .claimants in the calendar year succeeding that date and .applied to reduce the contribution the claimants made for persons employed by them on the State’s job a fair interpretation of the contract would mean that the cost thereof was reduced accordingly and upon such proof and such interpretation the State should have the benefit of the consequent lowered cost.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The theory of the legislation [§ 577] and its history do not support the contention that the credits are. a readjustment of the contribution rate for a particular year made retroactively.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.