Meaney v. Keating’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 1985
3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt · Shanahan v. . Monarch Engineering Co. · Matter of Grieb v. . Hammerle · Brassel v. Electric Welding Co. of America · Larscy v. T. Hogan & Sons, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The precise job at hand or the precise hours of work are not controlling on the question. The ultimate test is whether the service was incidental to the employment. “Where it can be found that the injury was sustained while the employee was engaged in an activity in the interest of his employer, or for the protection of the life or safety of a fellow employee which ultimately amounts to the same thing, it is within the power of the Board to find the accident arose out of and in the course of employment and as an incident to it.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Claimant to be present or case will be closed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.