Floreen v. Saucier’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1972
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Elmendorf v. Taylor · Coulson v. Harris · McPike v. Wells
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It has always been a principle of the Court of Chancery in England and in this country, that all persons interested in the litigation should, if practicable, be brought before the court. That rule has always been recognized as obligatory on the Federal courts. The only relaxations of it are where parties are very numerous, in which case some may sue on behalf of all. The case becomes a representative suit for or against a few who represent the many having a like common interest. " (Emphasis added). 54 Miss. 145 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barrett v. Coullet
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.