Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

200 N.C. 381

157 S.E 11

Salter v. . Gordon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1931

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1931-02-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1941

2 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“In the absence of an agreement as to repairs the landlord is not obligated to keep the building in repair for the benefit of his tenant. Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin , 156 N.C. 255 ; Fields v. Ogburn , 178 N.C. 407 ; Tucker v. Yarn Mill Co. , 194 N.C. 756 .”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Livingston v. . Investment Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Cukiam.

¶1 Tbe defendant owned a building in Norfolk, Virginia, wbieb bad been rented by tbe plaintiff’s busband as sublessee. On tbe second story there was a balcony from wbieb tbe plaintiff fell to tbe pavement, sustaining personal injury. Sbe brought suit for damages, alleging that her fall was due to tbe negligence of the defendant in failing to keep the railing on tbe balcony in a reasonably safe condition. At tbe close of tbe plaintiff’s evidence tbe action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit.' Tbe plaintiff excepted and appealed.

¶2 A sublessee can have no greater claim against tbe landlord than tbe tenant would have under like circumstances. Jordan v. Miller, 179 N. C., 73. In tbe absence of an agreement as to repairs tbe landlord is not obligated to beep tbe building in repair for tbe benefit of bis tenant. Improvement Co. v. Coley-Bardin, 156 N. C., 255; Fields v. Ogburn, 178 N. C., 407; Tucker v. Yarn Mill Co., 194 N. C., 756. Tbe record contains no evidence of tbe landlord’s agreement to make repairs. Judgment

¶3 Affirmed.

/200/nc/381 · .json · Public domain