Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 N.C. App. 216 - State v. Anderson

200 N.C. App. 216 - State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Los Angeles v. Department of Transportation · Allison v. United States · CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood · Drye v. United States · Peoples v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n its closing argument, the State may properly bring to the jury's attention the failure of a defendant to produce exculpatory evidence or to contradict evidence presented by the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[the] illustration enabled the jury to better understand his testimony and to realize completely its cogency and force.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “requiring substantially similar circumstances to test the validity of such a hypothesis”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.