200 N.C. App. 614 - State v. Hagerman’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · 199 N.C. App. 321 - State v. Wagoner · 200 N.C. App. 123 - State v. Morrow · 200 N.C. App. 193 - State v. Stines · 200 N.C. App. 664 - State v. Vogt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he imposition of SBM, as a civil remedy, could not increase the maximum penalty for defendant's crime. The State did not need to present any facts in an indictment or prove any facts beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury in order to subject defendant to SBM.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“); State v. Wagoner, ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 683 S.E.2d 391, 400 (2009) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.