Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 N.J. 601 - State v. Bieniek

State v. Bieniek’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Roth · State v. Natale · State v. O'DONNELL · State v. Ghertler · Woodard v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “important for meaningful appellate review of any criminal sentence,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “expected to assess the aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether they 'were based upon competent credible evidence in the record.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An appellate court is not to substitute its assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors for that of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.