200 N.J. Super. 28 - State v. Scioscia’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably In Re the Request for Solid Waste Utility Customer Lists (1987), 249 N.J. Super. 336 - State v. Engel (1991)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Parker v. Brown · Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the purpose of the "public utility" exemption is to prevent business entities from being subjected to conflicting sets of governmental regulations. In our view, the statutory exception is designed to obviate potential conflicts where a public utility is required or permitted by the BPU to engage in anti-competitive activities that would otherwise be proscribed by the Antitrust Act. [ 200 N.J. Super. at 39 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“No provisions of this act shall be construed to make illegal ... [t]he activities of any public utility... to the extent that such activities are subject to the jurisdiction of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners.... [ N.J.S.A. 56:9-5b(3)]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“bidding practices which had been long dominant in the industry. The conspiracy was implemented through the formation of the New Jersey Trade Waste Association (TWA). In order to prevent competition between collectors, the TWA provided an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.