State v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2021
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Simmons v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Is charged with an offense of possession, (2) Is legitimately on the premises when the search occurs, or (3) Has a proprietary or possessory interest in the property seized.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““ ‘In order to qualify as a “person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure” one must have been a victim of a search or seizure, one against whom the search was directed, as distinguished from one who claims prejudice only through the use of evidence gathered as a consequence of a search or seizure directed at someone else.’ Id. at 261 , 80 S.Ct. at 731 , 4 L.Ed.2d at 702 . See also State v. Shank, 191 N.W.2d 703, 705 (Iowa 1971).” Osborn, supra, 200 N.W.2d at 803 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dixon““The basic purpose of Amendment 4 is ‘to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals’ rather than property. Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523, 528 , 87 S.Ct. 1727, 1730 , 18 L.Ed.2d 930, 935 ; accord, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294, 304 , 87 S.Ct. 1642, 1648 , 18 L.Ed.2d 782, 790 . ‘For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.’ Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 , 88 S.Ct. 507, 511 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576, 581 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.