Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 N.Y. 72 - Ackerman v. . Ackerman

Ackerman v. . Ackerman’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
4
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Pasquariello v. Pasquariello (1975), Gair v. Peck (1959)

3 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

14019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedAckerman v. Ackerman

Relationships

Relies on The Harrisburg · Forbell v. . City of New York · Reining v. . City of Buffalo, Etc. · Hill v. Board of Supervisors · Hayden v. . Pierce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A married person may maintain an action to procure a judgment ‘divorcing the parties and dissolving the marriage by reason of the defendant’s adultery’ where (among other cases) the parties were married within the state, or the plaintiff was a resident of the state when the offense was committed and is a resident thereof when the action is commenced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.