Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 OKLA 325 - Poulos v. Carter

Poulos v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1966
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coalgate Abstract Co. v. Coal County Abstract Co. · O K Bus & Baggage Co. v. O K Transfer & Storage Co. · Stillwater Milling Co. v. Eddie · Home Insulation Co. v. Home & Building Insulation Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Upon the consideration of a demurrer to a petition only those facts well pleaded in the petition are admitted by the demurrer. * * * mere conclusions of a pleader stated in general terms do not constitute well pleaded facts which a demurrer admits. >{< ⅝ ⅝ if”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““To contend that customers of plaintiff could be misled by the phonetic similarity of the word ‘night’ and the combination of the letters ‘nite’ is to say that they are ignorant or careless or unobservant. No person with a knowledge of the English language would be misled as to the identity of the two establishments by the mere phonetics of the two trade names.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.