200 Or. App. 684 - State v. Leckenby’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the court did not give the lesser-included instructions, the jury did not have a complete statement of the law, and we are unable to determine what the verdict would have been had the jury been properly instructed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if the jury is not aware of the lesser offense, it is unlikely to have an effect on how the jury evaluates the greater offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.