Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 Or. App. 684 - State v. Leckenby

200 Or. App. 684 - State v. Leckenby’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the court did not give the lesser-included instructions, the jury did not have a complete statement of the law, and we are unable to determine what the verdict would have been had the jury been properly instructed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if the jury is not aware of the lesser offense, it is unlikely to have an effect on how the jury evaluates the greater offense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.