State v. Buzzell’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo · 106 Wash. 2d 176 - State v. Hughes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[l]ike Charles, the evidence supported that Buzzell either used forcible compulsion or that [the victim] consented to the sexual contact”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wright“according to the testimony, the sexual contact was either through forcible compulsion or it was consensual”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Wright
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.