Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

200 So. 2d 240

Diehl v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1967-06-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1972

2 state decisions

Relies on Flowers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1967-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PEARSON, Judge

¶1(dissenting).

¶2I must respectfully dissent since I feel that the evidence was insufficient to show that this defendant was the person who took the car. See Flowers v. State, 106 Fla. 686, 143 So. 612 (1932).

/200/so2d/240 · .json · Public domain