Dailey v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 103 So. 2d 672 - Budgen v. Brady · 160 So. 2d 543 - Deese v. White Belt Dairy Farms, Inc. · 181 So. 2d 212 - Smith v. Peninsular Insurance Company · Cash v. Gates · 138 So. 2d 521 - Ely v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Motions for judgment notwithstanding verdict, like motions for directed verdict, should be resolved with extreme caution since the granting thereof holds that one side of the case is essentially devoid of probative evidence. [Citations omitted]. The movant admits all material facts as attested by his adversary and also admits all inferences of fact favorable to the adversary that reasonably might be drawn from the evidence as a whole. * * * If there is room for difference among reasonable men as to the existence of a material fact sought to be established, or as to a material inference which reasonably might be drawn from established facts, the case should be submitted to the jury. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“competent, substantial evidence at the trial to support the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.