Lyons v. Lyons’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1968
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 182 So. 2d 1 - Brackin v. Brackin · Brooks v. Brooks · Nolan v. Eshleman · Hines v. Hines · Hadley v. Hadley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are contemplating a revision of this rule in the near future to provide that during the pendency of an appeal from an alimony award the amount awarded by the chancellor may be accepted without prejudice to the appeal. In the meantime, following Brackin v. Brackin, supra, our decision in this case will apply similarly as contemplated in the indicated rule revision.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““When [the rule] is not utilized, its non-use in nowise affects the rights of anyone. Its mere non-use cannot be used as a weapon.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.