Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 So. 3d 1007 - Smith v. Smith

200 So. 3d 1007 - Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 842 So. 2d 1160 - Ellington v. Ellington · 140 So. 3d 253 - Mazzini v. Strathman · 88 So. 3d 652 - Raymond v. Fluellen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Lisa suspensively appealed the judgment. DISCUSSION Standard of Review A trial court's rulings regarding the partitioning of community property are reviewed under the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “standard, granting great discretion to the trial court. Smith v. Smith , 15-1231, p. 2 (La. App. 4 Cir. 9/14/16), 200 So.3d 1007 , 1009.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In the absence of such concurrence, the alienation, encumbrance, or lease is a relative nullity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.