Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 600 So. 2d 374 - Burks v. State · 531 So. 2d 35 - Maul v. State · 25 Ala. App. 34 - Oliver v. State · Ebens v. State · 434 So. 2d 737 - Ex Parte Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thompson v. State , 92 So.3d 801 , 805 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. State · R.V.D. v. State“In pronouncing sentence, the court shall ... [a]fford the defendant an opportunity to make a statement in his or her own behalf before imposing sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. R.V.D. v. State · R.V.D. v. State“On remand the circuit court shall conduct a sentencing hearing in which a proper allocution is provided pursuant to Rule 26.9(b), Ala. R. Crim. P.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.