Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 So. 3d 841 - State v. Tabb

200 So. 3d 841 - State v. Tabb’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 756 So. 2d 565 - State v. International Fidelity Ins. Co. · 997 So. 2d 165 - State v. De La Rosa · 153 So. 3d 1276 - City of Lafayette v. Tyler · State v. Ramee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to and notwithstanding any other provision of law, a surety may seek an extension of time to surrender a defendant, or have the judgment of bond forfeiture set aside by filing a motion in the criminal court of record and after contradictory hearing with the district attorney and with proof satisfactory to the court that a fortuitous event has occurred and that the event has made it impossible to perform as required under the contract . A motion seeking relief pursuant to this Paragraph must be filed within three hundred sixty-six days from the date of the fortuitous event, excluding legal delays. The court in its discretion may do any of the following: (1) Set aside the forfeiture or grant the nullity. (2) Grant an extension of up to three hundred sixty-six days from the expiration of the initial time period allowed for the surrender of the defendant from the date of the mailing of proper notice of bond forfeiture. If the court grants that extension, judicial interest shall be suspended during that additional time period. (3) Deny the relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is no indication in La.Code Crim.P. art. 345(D) that a surety's obligation to pay transportation costs is dependent on the State seeking extradition or notifying the surety of the amount of costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.