Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 SO3D 878 - Green v. Holder

Green v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wooley v. Lucksinger · Schultz v. Guoth · Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. · Moreno v. Entergy Corp. · 68 So. 3d 499 - Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be applied as written and no further interpretation may be made in search of the intent of the legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.