Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 SW3D 41 - State v. Scott

State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Chimel v. California · New York v. Belton · United States v. Robinson · United States v. Chadwick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the search of [Defendant’s] car was a valid search incident to his arrest regardless of the officer’s intent to search for drugs or the fact that [Defendant] was handcuffed in the patrol car at the time of the search”); State v. Reed, 157 S.W.3d 353, 359 (Mo.App.2005) (interpreting Belton and Harvey to allow searches of the passenger compartment of a vehicle incident to arrest”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.