Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 Wash. 380 - Delsman v. Bertotti

Delsman v. Bertotti’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 1973
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1973

21 state decisions

9019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Hadenfeldt · Burlie v. Stephens · Leftridge v. City of Seattle · Silverstein v. Adams · Hartley v. Lasater

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The burden to avoid colliding with a car approaching from his right rests heavily upon the disfavored driver. A clear and unambiguous statute imposes this burden, and the ingrafting of exceptions upon this sound and wholesome rule of the road would tend only to confusion and lead drivers occupying the disfavored position under the statute to think that they might somehow escape the burden imposed upon them by law and throw the blame for unavoidable accidents upon another. . . .’ ””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . Under the law, appellant [disfavored driver] was required to look out for, and yield the right of way to, a vehicle approaching from his right. The observation which a driver in appellant’s position is required to make is observation from a point at which he can see, and decide when he can proceed within a reasonable margin of safety, not from a point back from the intersecting street, from which his view is seriously obstructed. ...””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.