Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 Wash. 699 - State v. Currie

State v. Currie’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 1978
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 1978

16 state decisions

9019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. West · State v. Marcy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that the court has the power to change and rewrite the rule, but that is a very different thing from excepting a particular individual from its operation or excusing its violation in a particular instance.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““No appeal in a criminal cause shall be effectual for any purpose unless the appellant shall, within sixty days after giving notice of appeal as hereinbefore provided, have filed or caused to be filed with the clerk of the supreme court the following: “(a) A statement of facts or bill of exceptions served on the respondent and certified by the judge of the superior court according to the procedure, so near as may be, in civil causes; . . . “Except as herein otherwise provided, . . . the filing in the supreme court of a certified statement of facts, . . . Shall be jurisdictional. “In any case where the proposed statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been filed with the clerk of the superior court within sixty days after giving notice of appeal as hereinabove provided, but the appellant, through no fault of his own, is unable to have the same certified in time to file the same with the clerk of the supreme court within the time herein specified, the time for such certification may, upon good cause shown, be extended by the chief justice of the supreme court, or, in his absence, any other judge thereof; and if such extension be granted, said chief justice of the supreme court or judge thereof shall, in the same order, fix the time for filing the appellant’s opening brief and abstract of record.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In attempting to conduct his own appeal, the appellant assumed an undertaking which was far beyond his capacity and understanding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.