Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 W. Va. 192 - Morrison v. Sharma

200 W. Va. 192 - Morrison v. Sharma’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New Jersey v. New York · Texas v. New Mexico · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · In re Vey · 194 W. Va. 97 - Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'reasonably clear that prejudicial error has crept into the record or that substantial justice has not been done.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[wjhen a trial judge vacates a jury verdict and awards a new trial pursuant to Rule 59 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure, the trial judge has the authority to weigh the evidence and consider the credibility of the witnesses. If the trial judge finds the verdict is against the clear weight of the evidence, is based on false evidence or will result in a miscarriage of justice, the tidal judge may set aside the verdict, even if supported by substantial evidence, and grant a new trial. A trial judge’s decision to award a new trial is not subject to appellate review unless the trial judge abuses his or her discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.