Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 200 W. Va. 700 - Skaff v. Pridemore

200 W. Va. 700 - Skaff v. Pridemore’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Ferri v. Ackerman · 192 W. Va. 561 - Adkins v. Gatson · 191 W. Va. 134 - Francis O. Day Co. v. Director, Division of Environmental Protection · 195 W. Va. 488 - Gribben v. Kirk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Our general rule is that nonjurisdictional questions not raised at the circuit court level, but raised for the first time on appeal, will not be considered." It is clear that "the constitutional immunity of the State of West Virginia from suit by Article VI, Section 35 of the Constitution of this State can not be waived by the Legislature or any other instrumentality of the State." Therefore, the appellant did not waive the defense of sovereign immunity by failing to raise it below. (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the sovereign immunity doctrine is implicated when retroactive money relief against the State is sought, but does not operate to bar an award which is prospective in nature”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Our general rule is that nonjurisdictional questions not raised at the circuit court level, but raised for the first time on appeal, will not be considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.