Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 ME 136 - Crowe v. Shaw

Crowe v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wing v. Morse · Champagne v. Mid-Maine Medical Center · Binette v. Dyer Library Ass'n · Corey v. Norman, Hanson & DeTroy · Shaw v. Bolduc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence is sufficient to support a finding of proximate cause if the evidence and inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence indicate that the negligence played a substantial part in bringing about or actually causing the injury or damage and that the injury or damage was either a direct result or a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the negligence. The mere possibility of such causation is not enough, and when the matter remains one of pure speculation or conjecture, or even if the probabilities are evenly balanced, a defendant is entitled to a judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.