Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 ME 211 - State v. Black

State v. Black’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2024

16 state decisions

110200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Andujar · State v. Ardolino · State v. Wilder · State v. Bonney · State v. Glover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In examining the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the State to determine whether the trier of fact rationally could have found beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged. We will overturn the [trial court’s] judgment only if no trier of fact rationally could have found the essential elements of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is the [trial court's] duty to reconcile conflicting testimony, determine its relative weight, and decide which part of the testimony was credible and worthy of belief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.