Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 ME 93 - Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.

Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stickles v. United Parcel Service · Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott Paper · Wentworth v. Manpower Temporary Services · Rosetti v. Land Reclamation · Kennedy v. Brunswick Convalescent Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “3. Subrogation. Any insurer determined to be liable for benefits under subsection 2 must be subrogated to the employee’s rights under this Act for all benefits the insurer has paid and for which another insurer may be liable. Apportionment decisions made under this subsection may not affect an employee’s rights and benefits under this Act. The board has jurisdiction over proceedings to determine the apportionment of liability among responsible insurers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.