State v. Hocevar’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably State v. Clifford (2005), State v. Freshment (2002)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Watts · Hulse v. State, Department of Justice · State v. Matt · State v. Montoya · State v. Weaver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The timing element [of Rule 803(1) ] assures the trustworthiness of present sense impressions in two ways: it reduces the likelihood of faulty recollection and precludes time for reflection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Laird“[a] statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Laird“a description of events that were observed in the past.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Laird
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.