Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 MT 170 - Eisenman v. State

Eisenman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Teague v. Lane · Peyton v. Rowe · Montana v. Egelhoff · Garlotte v. Fordice · State v. Guillaume

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e hold that if the criminal defendant, for no other reason than his [indigence], is unable to secure his pre-sentence freedom by posting bail, then he is entitled to good-time credit for the time he spends in the county detention facility, pre-sentence, to the same extent that the law allows good-time credit to the criminal defendant who is able to post bail and, thus, serve the entirety of his sentence in the state correctional facility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it is not premature to consider a habeas petition prior to the time the inmate is entitled to [relief]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “immediate physical release is not the only remedy available under a writ of habeas corpus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.