Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 MT 188 - State v. Sprinkle

State v. Sprinkle’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2021

12 state decisions

80200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Jones · State v. LaMere · State v. Stevens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sentencing is based on statutory law. We review the district court's application of the sentencing statutes to determine whether the district court was correct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a preponderance of the information, including information submitted during the trial, during the sentencing hearing, and in so much of the presentence report as the court relies on.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.