Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 MT 211 - State v. Fey

State v. Fey’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kemp · State v. Clay · State v. Kaczmarek · Hauck v. Seright · State v. Ungaretti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To be sufficient, corroborating evidence must show more than that a crime was in fact committed or the circumstances of its commission. It must raise more than a suspicion of the defendant's involvement in, or opportunity to commit, the crime charged. But corroborative evidence need not be sufficient, by itself, to support a defendant's conviction or even to make out a prima facie case against him. Corroborating evidence may be circumstantial and can come from the defendant or his witnesses. [Emphasis added.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.