State v. Fey’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2022
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kemp · State v. Clay · State v. Kaczmarek · Hauck v. Seright · State v. Ungaretti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be sufficient, corroborating evidence must show more than that a crime was in fact committed or the circumstances of its commission. It must raise more than a suspicion of the defendant's involvement in, or opportunity to commit, the crime charged. But corroborative evidence need not be sufficient, by itself, to support a defendant's conviction or even to make out a prima facie case against him. Corroborating evidence may be circumstantial and can come from the defendant or his witnesses. [Emphasis added.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Burkhart · State v. Black
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.