Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 MT 255 - State v. Tucker

State v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Montoya · State v. Swoboda · State v. Sprinkle · State v. Whaley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If it appears by a preponderance of the information, including information submitted during the trial, during the sentencing hearing, and in so much of the presentence report as the court relies on, that none of the exceptions at issue apply, the court shall impose the appropriate mandatory sentence. The court shall state the reasons for its decision in writing and shall include an identification of the facts relied upon in making its determination. The statement shall be included in the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We refuse to remand for resentencing when a defendant failed to bring the allegations of sentencing errors to the district court's attention in a timely fashion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the offender ... was acting under unusual and substantial duress”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.