State v. Pritchett’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
81 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State v. Ariegwe (2007), State v. Heath (2004)
81 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc. · State v. Montoya · State v. Hilgers · State v. Farrell · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) all special damages, but not general damages, substantiated by evidence in the record, that a person could recover against the offender in a civil action arising out of the facts or events constituting the offender’s criminal activities, including without limitation out-of-pocket losses, such as medical expenses, loss of income, expenses reasonably incurred in obtaining ordinary and necessary services that the victim would have performed if not injured, expenses reasonably incurred in attending court proceedings related to the commission of the offense, and reasonable expenses related to funeral and burial or crematory services; (d) reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the victim in filing charges or in cooperating in the investigation and prosecution of the offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re TMR · State v. Good“are not authorized to impose a sentence of restitution until all these additional statutory requirements are satisfied.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) Whenever the court believes that a victim may have sustained a pecuniary loss or whenever the prosecuting attorney requests, the court shall order the probation officer, restitution officer, or other designated person to include in the presentence investigation and report: (a) a list of the offender’s assets; and (b) an affidavit that specifically describes the victim’s pecuniary loss and the replacement value in dollars of the loss, submitted by the victim. (2) When a presentence report is not authorized or requested, the court shall accept evidence of the victim’s loss at the time of sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Coluccio
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.