Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 MT 282 - State v. Brady

State v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Flack · State v. Brodniak · State v. Partin · State v. Ford · State v. Bromgard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The strength of the evidence against the defendant together with the prejudicial influence of the inadmissible evidence and whether a cautionary, jury instruction could cure any prejudice must be considered in determining whether a prohibited statement contributed to the conviction. A mistrial should be denied, however, for technical errors or defects that do not affect the substantial rights of the defendant and the record is sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. [Internal citations omitted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.