Infinity Insurance v. Dodson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 district · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably State v. Triplett (2008), Montana Vending, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (2003)
2 district · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bruner v. Yellowstone County · 57 Cal. 2d 699 - Jurd v. Pacific Indemnity Co. · St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Thompson · Grossman v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources · Bauer Ranch, Inc. v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1)(a) ... [A] policy of motor vehicle Hiability coverage under Subsection 31A-22-302(1)(a) shall: [[Image here]] (M(A) if it is an owner's policy, designate by appropriate reference all the motor vehicles on which coverage is granted, insure the person named in the policy, insure any other person using any named motor vehicle with the express or implied permission of the named insured, and, exeept as provided in Subsection (7), insure any person included in Subsection against loss from liability imposed by law for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of these motor vehicles within the United States and Canada, subject to limits exclusive of interest and costs, for each motor vehicle, in amounts not less than the minimum limits specified under Section 31A-22-304. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.