State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Kroll (2004), State v. Seals (2007)
4 federal appellate · 53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Villano · State v. Montoya · State v. Lane · State v. Waters · State v. Osterloth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the defendant was afforded the opportunity to respond to its inclusion upon sufficient notice at sentencing, and (2) whether that portion of the written judgment substantively increases the defendant’s loss of liberty or the defendant’s sacrifice of property.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Andress · State v. Malloy“is the 'legally effective sentence and valid, final judgment.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hamilton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.